Voters’ evaluation of (contra-)prototypical political candidates : an experimental test of the interaction of candidate gender and policy positions cues in Flanders (Belgium)
Following social psychological models of impression formation, information about candidates' policy positions shapes voters' impressions of their personal qualities (Rahn et al., 1990). This paper presents an experimental test of the impact of the inclusion of information about candidates' policy positions on the prevalence of issue competence stereotypes in Flanders (Belgium), i.e. the idea that male and female candidates have different areas of issue competence. Respondents are found to primarily base their evaluation of the presented candidates on the policy positions presented by the candi... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | journalarticle |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2020 |
Schlagwörter: | Law and Political Science / Heuristic cues / Gender / Political gender stereotypes / Survey experiment / Political representation / Voting behaviour / STEREOTYPE ACTIVATION / WOMEN / SUPPORT / MEN / INFORMATION / PERCEPTION / ELECTIONS / JUDGMENT / PARTY |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28959167 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8677866 |
Following social psychological models of impression formation, information about candidates' policy positions shapes voters' impressions of their personal qualities (Rahn et al., 1990). This paper presents an experimental test of the impact of the inclusion of information about candidates' policy positions on the prevalence of issue competence stereotypes in Flanders (Belgium), i.e. the idea that male and female candidates have different areas of issue competence. Respondents are found to primarily base their evaluation of the presented candidates on the policy positions presented by the candidate and the extent to which they agree with the presented policy positions. It can therefore be concluded that the inclusion of information about candidates' policy positions trumps the effects of candidate gender on voters' preferences. This decreased stereotype reliance is potentially beneficial for female candidates because it also decreases the chances of a voter bias.