Performance of glycated hemoglobin A1c for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Belgium (2020-2021).
OBJECTIVES: During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, health care access was restricted. To reduce the risk of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, simplified screening recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been suggested, leading to glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) being proposed as an alternative to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This study aimed to assess the optimal HbA1c cutoff to confirm GDM diagnosis according to IADPSG/WHO2013 guidelines. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 3361 pregnancies were followed at the hospital... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2023 |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Elsevier Scientific Publishers
|
Schlagwörter: | Pregnancy / Female / Humans / Diabetes / Gestational / Glycated Hemoglobin / SARS-CoV-2 / Retrospective Studies / Belgium / Pandemics / COVID-19 / Blood Glucose / COVID-19 Testing / Epidemiology / Gestational diabetes mellitus / HbA1c / IADPSG/WHO criteria |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28944634 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/283129 |
OBJECTIVES: During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, health care access was restricted. To reduce the risk of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, simplified screening recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been suggested, leading to glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) being proposed as an alternative to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This study aimed to assess the optimal HbA1c cutoff to confirm GDM diagnosis according to IADPSG/WHO2013 guidelines. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 3361 pregnancies were followed at the hospital of Mouscron and the Cliniques Universitaires St Luc in Brussels (2020-2021). GDM was universally screened in the third trimester of gestation. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HbA1c with OGTT as the reference. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for different HbA1c thresholds were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 312 women were selected due to HbA1c analysis in addition to OGTT, and 149 had GDM. The area under the ROC curve for GDM detection by HbA1c was 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.79, p < 0.0001). The cutoff value chosen as a possible threshold was HbA1c 5.5% (37 mmol/mol). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios for this cutoff were 12.0%, 99.4%, 20 and 0.88, respectively. The Fagan nomogram test showed a posttest GDM probability of approximately 70%, corresponding to a 10-fold higher pretest probability. An HbA1c ≥ 5.5% (37 mmol/mol) would have avoided OGTT in 18% of women with GDM. These women with an HbA1c ≥ 5.5% had significantly higher rates of family history of diabetes, older age, higher BMI and higher blood glucose levels (fasting, 1 h and 2 h) at OGTT. CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with the literature concerning the diagnostic ability of GDM through HbA1c ≥ 5.5%.