First do no harm: euthanasia of patients with dementia in Belgium
Euthanasia in Belgium is not limited to terminally ill patients. It may be applied to patients with chronic degenerative diseases. Currently, people in Belgium wish to make it possible to euthanize incompetent patients who suffer from dementia. This article explains the Belgian law and then explores arguments for and against euthanasia of patients with dementia. It probes the dementia paradox by elucidating Dworkin's distinction between critical and experiential interests, arguing that at the end-of-life this distinction is not clearcut. It argues against euthanasia for patients with dementia,... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Journal article |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2015 |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Oxford University Press
|
Schlagwörter: | Autonomy / Belgium / Beneficence / Critical and experiential interests / Dementia paradox / Euthanasia |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28928358 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/file/383448/1/Article |
Euthanasia in Belgium is not limited to terminally ill patients. It may be applied to patients with chronic degenerative diseases. Currently, people in Belgium wish to make it possible to euthanize incompetent patients who suffer from dementia. This article explains the Belgian law and then explores arguments for and against euthanasia of patients with dementia. It probes the dementia paradox by elucidating Dworkin's distinction between critical and experiential interests, arguing that at the end-of-life this distinction is not clearcut. It argues against euthanasia for patients with dementia, for respecting patients' humanity and for providing them with more care, compassion, and good doctoring.