Assembling the Irreconcilable : Youth Workers, Development Policies and ‘High Risk’ Boys in the Netherlands
This article demonstrates how youth workers in a Dutch city bring together seemingly irreconcilable worlds: the development policies of their organisations and the state on the one hand and the practices, needs and aspirations of young people on the other. Current policies, like much academic literature on street-level professionals, define youth workers as frontline workers, implementing policies as representatives of their organisations. We approach these workers not as representatives but as brokers. Based on detailed ethnographic research with two youth workers and their interactions with... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | article/Letter to editor |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2018 |
Schlagwörter: | Brokerage / frontline work / the Netherlands / youth / youth workers |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28793158 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/assembling-the-irreconcilable-youth-workers-development-policies- |
This article demonstrates how youth workers in a Dutch city bring together seemingly irreconcilable worlds: the development policies of their organisations and the state on the one hand and the practices, needs and aspirations of young people on the other. Current policies, like much academic literature on street-level professionals, define youth workers as frontline workers, implementing policies as representatives of their organisations. We approach these workers not as representatives but as brokers. Based on detailed ethnographic research with two youth workers and their interactions with so-called high-risk boys, we demonstrate that these workers constantly negotiate boundaries, as they are positioned between the policies and the youth. On a theoretical level, employing the concept of ‘correspondence’, we argue that these brokers bring together different actors, institutions and resources, yet without fully integrating them and without forfeiting their own autonomous position.