In de marge van de canon: Over Nederlandse architectuur in de eerste architectuurgeschiedenisboeken

The problematic relationship between, on the one hand, monographs and local and national studies and, on the other hand, general historiography is the subject of much debate nowadays. Informed by the postcolonialist theory of architecture and more recent attempts to write alternative world histories of art and architecture, the question arises how the history of architecture can provide insight into the vast diversity of our built environment. How can we develop alternatives for the stereotypical architectural canon and its persistent margins? The present article explores the origins of one of... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Petra Brouwer
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2015
Reihe/Periodikum: Bulletin KNOB, Pp 39-55 (2015)
Verlag/Hrsg.: KNOB
Schlagwörter: Architecture / NA1-9428 / Architectural drawing and design / NA2695-2793 / History (General) and history of Europe / D
Sprache: Englisch
Niederländisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28704482
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.7480/knob.114.2015.1.1000

The problematic relationship between, on the one hand, monographs and local and national studies and, on the other hand, general historiography is the subject of much debate nowadays. Informed by the postcolonialist theory of architecture and more recent attempts to write alternative world histories of art and architecture, the question arises how the history of architecture can provide insight into the vast diversity of our built environment. How can we develop alternatives for the stereotypical architectural canon and its persistent margins? The present article explores the origins of one of those margins: the Dutch architecture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. It describes how Dutch architecture was characterized and evaluated in the first surveys of architectural history of the 1850s: J. Fergusson, The Illustrated Handbook of Architecture: Being a Concise and Popular Account of the Different Styles of Architecture Prevailing in All Ages and Countries (1855), W. Lübke, Geschichte der Architektur. Von den ältesten Zeiten bis auf die Gegenwart (1855); and F. Kugler’s fivevolume Geschichte der Baukunst (1856-1873). In order to make the immense subject of the history of architecture comprehensible, Fergusson, Lübke and Kugler constructed a continuous narrative through the ages in their books. Readers would follow the progressive development of architectural styles by means of the most representative and purest examples, such as the French and German cathedrals of the Gothic era and the Italian palazzi and French castles of the Renaissance. This descriptive method reduced all other historical monuments, including the Dutch ones, to buildings that were less pure in style and therefore marginal examples of the main style. Numerous more specific studies appeared to make marginal styles more widely known and sometimes neargued for their appreciation as well. For example, Auguste Schoy wrote in his Histoire de l’influence Italienne sur l’architecture dans les Pays-Bas (1879) that the Dutch Renaissance style ought to ...