Nature, frequency and determinants of prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies

Aims To examine the nature, frequency and determinants of prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies. Methods A prospective case‐control study comparing modified prescriptions with nonmodified prescriptions was carried out in 141 Dutch community pharmacies. 2014 modified prescriptions (cases), collected in the selected pharmacies on a predetermined day in a specific period (25th February until 12th March 1999) and 2581 nonmodified prescriptions (controls) randomly selected on the same day were studied. The nature and frequency of prescription modifications and patient, drug and p... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Buurma, Henk
De Smet, Peter A. G. M.
Van Den Hoff, Olga P.
Egberts, Antoine C. G.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2001
Reihe/Periodikum: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology ; volume 52, issue 1, page 85-91 ; ISSN 0306-5251 1365-2125
Verlag/Hrsg.: Wiley
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28641596
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01406.x

Aims To examine the nature, frequency and determinants of prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies. Methods A prospective case‐control study comparing modified prescriptions with nonmodified prescriptions was carried out in 141 Dutch community pharmacies. 2014 modified prescriptions (cases), collected in the selected pharmacies on a predetermined day in a specific period (25th February until 12th March 1999) and 2581 nonmodified prescriptions (controls) randomly selected on the same day were studied. The nature and frequency of prescription modifications and patient, drug and prescriber related determinants for a modified prescription were assessed. Results The overall incidence of prescription modifications was 4.3%, with a mean of 14.3 modifications per pharmacy per day. For prescription only medicines (POM) the incidence was 4.9%. The majority of POM modifications concerned a clarification (71.8%). In 22.2% a prescription could potentially have had clinical consequences when not altered; in more than half of the latter it concerned a dose error (13.7% of all cases). POM prescriptions of patients of 40–65 years had a significantly lower chance of modification compared with those of younger people (OR = 0.74 [0.64–0.86]). With respect to medication‐class, we found a higher chance of POM modifications in the respiratory domain (OR = 1.48 [1.23‐1.79]) and a decreased chance for nervous system POMs (OR = 0.71 [0.61–0.83]). With regard to prescriber‐related determinants modifications were found three times more often in non printed prescriptions than in printed ones (OR = 3.30 [2.90‐3.75]). Compared with prescriptions by the patient's own GP, prescriptions of specialists (OR = 1.82 [1.57‐2.11]), other GP's (OR = 1.49 [1.02‐2.17]) and other prescribers such as dentists and midwives (OR = 1.95 [1.06‐3.57]) gave a higher probability of prescription modifications. When a GP had no on‐line access to the computer of the pharmacy the chance of a modification was also higher (OR = 1.61 [1.33‐1.94]). ...