Measuring anxiety symptoms – psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Scale Questionnaire

The Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (LWASQ) is a self-report questionnaire based on the tripartite model of Lang (1971) for measuring treatment progress. However, so far little is known about its psychometric qualities. Two studies were conducted to get more clarity on the factor structure and reliability of the LWASQ. Method: Factor structure and internal consistency of the LWASQ were assessed using a sample of 2,117 patients with anxiety disorders. Test–retest reliability was measured with a three-week interval, using a sample of 49 people in a general population. We aimed to m... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Peerbooms, Vivian
van den Boogaard, Th Michael
Melchior, Kim
Jongerling, Joran
van der Heiden, Colin
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Reihe/Periodikum: Peerbooms , V , van den Boogaard , T M , Melchior , K , Jongerling , J & van der Heiden , C 2024 , ' Measuring anxiety symptoms – psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Scale Questionnaire ' , Psychological Test Adaptation and Development , vol. 5 , no. 1 , pp. 46-53 . https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000063
Schlagwörter: anxiety disorders / factor analysis / LWASQ / tripartite model / validation
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28621533
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/ec9b3b8d-437b-460f-9824-f216f5705792

The Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (LWASQ) is a self-report questionnaire based on the tripartite model of Lang (1971) for measuring treatment progress. However, so far little is known about its psychometric qualities. Two studies were conducted to get more clarity on the factor structure and reliability of the LWASQ. Method: Factor structure and internal consistency of the LWASQ were assessed using a sample of 2,117 patients with anxiety disorders. Test–retest reliability was measured with a three-week interval, using a sample of 49 people in a general population. We aimed to measure construct validity with a third sample of patients with anxiety disorders, but were not able to due to a small sample size. Results: Factor analysis confirmed the three known factors of the LWASQ, i.e., somatic complaints, cognitive problems, and behavioral complaints. Both internal consistency for all three subscales (r =.852–.927) and test–retest reliability were found to be good (r =.88). Conclusion: Psychometric properties of the LWASQ are promising, but further validation is needed to draw more definitive conclusions regarding its usefulness in a clinical population.