Evaluation of Legal Research: Comparison of the Outcomes of a Swiss and Dutch National Survey
Law as a discipline is lagging behind other (social) sciences when it comes to research evaluation. There is no European ranking of law journals or legal publishers, no generally accepted system of peer review, no bibliometrical databases, and no consensus on quality indicators for academic legal publications. Scholars in Switzerland and the Netherlands organized surveys to ask their colleagues how they feel about different research evaluation methods and which quality indicators they prefer for the assessment of their research. The results reveal that, unlike university managers, legal schola... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2018 |
Reihe/Periodikum: | Tilburg Law Review, Vol 23 (2018) |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Ubiquity Press
|
Schlagwörter: | Research evaluation / academic legal research / evaluation methods / quality criteria / Law of Europe / KJ-KKZ / Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence / K1-7720 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28581613 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.6 |