Islamism, Political Islam, and the Need for Critique
This article is about Islamism (or political Islam) as a challenge for contemporary liberal democracies. Islamism is portrayed as an ideology that favors one specific religion as supreme and that is a threat to freedom of speech. The author makes a plea for distinguishing a. the religion of Islam, b. Muslims as a group, and c. the political ideology of Islamism. Regarding the dangers of Islamism, some sociological research about the convictions of Muslims is discussed (Koopmans, Esposito) and the most recent case from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg—E.S. v. Austria (2018: 3845... Mehr ...
| Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2021 |
| Reihe/Periodikum: | Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University, Vol 19, Iss 3, Pp 69-87 (2021) |
| Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Sciendo
|
| Schlagwörter: | islamism / religious terrorism / theoterrorism / freedom of speech / religious criticism / islamophobia / elisabeth sabaditsch-wolff / e.s. v. austria (echr) / koopmans / esposito / Philosophy. Psychology. Religion / B |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27641193 |
| Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
| Powered By: | BASE |
| Link(s) : | https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2021-0018 |
This article is about Islamism (or political Islam) as a challenge for contemporary liberal democracies. Islamism is portrayed as an ideology that favors one specific religion as supreme and that is a threat to freedom of speech. The author makes a plea for distinguishing a. the religion of Islam, b. Muslims as a group, and c. the political ideology of Islamism. Regarding the dangers of Islamism, some sociological research about the convictions of Muslims is discussed (Koopmans, Esposito) and the most recent case from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg—E.S. v. Austria (2018: 38450/12)—is analysed, which renders all criticism of Islam and Islamism difficult, if not impossible.