Teaching Roman law in the 21st century:A note on legal-historical education in the Netherlands

Can Roman law still be a useful part of the compulsory curricular programme for legal education in the Netherlands At the beginning of the nineteenth century Roman law taught the student a further systematization of private law. Later it was seen as an introduction to present-day private law, irrespective of whether it was taught in a pandectistic or a more historical way. For the second half of the twentieth century three divergent approaches could be discerned i.e. a 'pandectistic', a 'neo-humanistic' and a 'legal historical' one. Given this until recently existing state of legal education,... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Hallebeek, Jan
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Hallebeek , J 2020 , ' Teaching Roman law in the 21st century : A note on legal-historical education in the Netherlands ' , Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung , vol. 137 , no. 1 , 6 , pp. 194-227 . https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgr-2020-0006
Schlagwörter: History of Legal Scholarship / Legal education / Legal History / Roman law / the Netherlands / /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/quality_education / name=SDG 4 - Quality Education / /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions / name=SDG 16 - Peace / Justice and Strong Institutions
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27621903
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/2a2d6804-7cff-4833-afae-cd4bc2fc370d

Can Roman law still be a useful part of the compulsory curricular programme for legal education in the Netherlands At the beginning of the nineteenth century Roman law taught the student a further systematization of private law. Later it was seen as an introduction to present-day private law, irrespective of whether it was taught in a pandectistic or a more historical way. For the second half of the twentieth century three divergent approaches could be discerned i.e. a 'pandectistic', a 'neo-humanistic' and a 'legal historical' one. Given this until recently existing state of legal education, various premises can be formulated, which preferably should underlie the teaching of Roman law in the near future, viz. an applicative approach, a connection with legal historical research, the awareness that the civilian tradition is not the only one and that it only started with the glossators, and avoiding anachronisms.