Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.

The success of large-scale screening for Chlamydia trachomatis depends on the availability of noninvasive samples, low costs, and high-quality testing. To evaluate C. trachomatis testing with pregnant women, first-void urine specimens from 750 consecutive asymptomatic pregnant women from the Rotterdam area (The Netherlands) were collected. Initially, we investigated the performance of three different DNA isolation methods with 350 of these urines and 70 pools of 5 of the same subset of urine samples. The routinely used COBAS AMPLICOR test was compared to the COBAS AMPLICOR test with prior DNA... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Rours, G.I.J.G. (Ingrid)
Verkooyen, R.P.A.J. (Roel)
Willemse, H.F.
Zwaan, E.A.E. (Elizabeth) van der
Belkum, A.F. (Alex) van
Groot, R. (Ronald) de
Verbrugh, H.A. (Henri)
Ossewaarde, J.M. (Jacobus)
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2005
Schlagwörter: *Polymerase Chain Reaction/economics/methods / *Reagent Kits / Diagnostic / Automation / Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis/microbiology / Chlamydia trachomatis/genetics/*isolation & purification / DNA / Bacterial/analysis/*isolation & purification / Female / Humans / Mass Screening / Netherlands / Pregnancy / Pregnancy Complications / Infectious/*diagnosis/microbiology / Sensitivity and Specificity / Urine/*microbiology
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27607789
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://repub.eur.nl/pub/13912

The success of large-scale screening for Chlamydia trachomatis depends on the availability of noninvasive samples, low costs, and high-quality testing. To evaluate C. trachomatis testing with pregnant women, first-void urine specimens from 750 consecutive asymptomatic pregnant women from the Rotterdam area (The Netherlands) were collected. Initially, we investigated the performance of three different DNA isolation methods with 350 of these urines and 70 pools of 5 of the same subset of urine samples. The routinely used COBAS AMPLICOR test was compared to the COBAS AMPLICOR test with prior DNA isolation by use of the MagNA Pure large-volume kit and the MagNA Pure bacterial DNA isolation kit. The latter combination provided the best DNA test for pooled urines, with a sensitivity twice that of the other methods. Next, using all 750 urines, the COBAS AMPLIC