Contingent self-definition and amorphous regions: a dynamic approach to place brand architecture

This article explores the concept of contingent self-definition, whereby place brands employ flexible self-definitional approaches in constructing their place brand architecture. Adopting a view of regions as social constructs, the article builds on and extends previous work on place brand architecture by identifying the underlying factors that drive contingent self-definition decisions. Based on an empirical study of professionals tasked with managing region brands in the Netherlands, eleven factors are identified as drivers of contingent self-definition by place brands. These factors are gro... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Dinnie, Keith
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Reihe/Periodikum: Dinnie , K 2017 , ' Contingent self-definition and amorphous regions: a dynamic approach to place brand architecture ' , Marketing Theory . https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117708467
Schlagwörter: Brand architecture / contingent self-definition / place branding / region brands / the Netherlands
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27604446
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/publications/2dcb79f7-8152-414c-8f34-f7cd51c6b5cb

This article explores the concept of contingent self-definition, whereby place brands employ flexible self-definitional approaches in constructing their place brand architecture. Adopting a view of regions as social constructs, the article builds on and extends previous work on place brand architecture by identifying the underlying factors that drive contingent self-definition decisions. Based on an empirical study of professionals tasked with managing region brands in the Netherlands, eleven factors are identified as drivers of contingent self-definition by place brands. These factors are grouped into four thematic categories: i) external perceptions, ii) proximity, iii) brand relationships, and iv) politics and power. A dynamic approach to place brand architecture is advocated, foregrounding the amorphous character of regions as social constructs that defy reification solely as fixed territorial-administrative spaces.