Between “medical” and “social” egg freezing:A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in Austria, Germany, Israel, and the Netherlands

Egg freezing has led to heated debates in healthcare policy and bioethics. A crucial issue in this context concerns the distinction between “medical” and “social” egg freezing (MEF and SEF)—contrasting objections to bio-medicalization with claims for oversimplification. Yet such categorization remains a criterion for regulation. This paper aims to explore the “regulatory boundary-work” around the “medical”–”social” distinction in different egg freezing regulations. Based on systematic documents’ analysis we present a cross-national comparison of the way the “medical”–”social” differentiation f... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Rimon-Zarfaty, Nitzan
Kostenzer, Johanna
Sismuth, Lisa-Katharina
de Bont, Antoinette
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Reihe/Periodikum: Rimon-Zarfaty , N , Kostenzer , J , Sismuth , L-K & de Bont , A 2021 , ' Between “medical” and “social” egg freezing : A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in Austria, Germany, Israel, and the Netherlands ' , Journal of Bioethical Inquiry , vol. 18 , no. 4 , pp. 683–699 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10133-z
Schlagwörter: Austria / Cross-national comparison / FERTILITY PRESERVATION / Germany / INFERTILITY / Israel / Medical egg freezing / NONMEDICAL REASONS / OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION / Regulation analysis / Regulatory boundary-work / Social egg freezing / The Netherlands
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27603175
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/a82e4d76-4b1e-471b-8a0b-10537d3ef150