Entering a Knowledge Pearl in Times of Creative Cities Policy and Strategy. The Case of Groningen, Netherlands
This chapter argues that: (1) urban inequalities and injustices associated with creative urbanism, for example in terms of employment, income, or housing, are not always visible in the way typically associated with global cities and therefore require nuanced analysis; (2) the “creative cities” paradigm (as well as the contestatory right to the city framework or the just city debate) offers a powerful explanatory device for global neoliberal urbanism, including examples of “creativity orthodoxy” and the capitalist city in Amsterdam, and (3) Groningen in the northern region of The Netherlands pr... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | bookPart |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2016 |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Palgrave MacMillan
|
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27602473 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://hdl.handle.net/11370/f3f32222-b0e8-40dd-9757-c691d47cd2e8 |
This chapter argues that: (1) urban inequalities and injustices associated with creative urbanism, for example in terms of employment, income, or housing, are not always visible in the way typically associated with global cities and therefore require nuanced analysis; (2) the “creative cities” paradigm (as well as the contestatory right to the city framework or the just city debate) offers a powerful explanatory device for global neoliberal urbanism, including examples of “creativity orthodoxy” and the capitalist city in Amsterdam, and (3) Groningen in the northern region of The Netherlands provides a compelling case of hidden inequalities and the politics of urban development in what Gabe et al. (2012) and van Winden et al. (Urban Studies 44 (3): 525-549, 2007) would term a “knowledge pearl” city.