Colonoscopic surveillance improves survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic surveillance provides the best practical means for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Strong evidence for improved survival from surveillance programmes is sparse. METHOD: The aim of this study was to compare tumour stage and survival of IBD patients with CRC who were a part of a surveillance programme with those who were not. A nationwide pathology database (PALGA (pathologisch anatomisch landelijk geautomatiseerd archief)) was consulted to identify IBD patients with CRC treated in all eight university hospitals in The Net... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Lutgens, M. W. M. D.
Oldenburg, B.
Siersema, P. D.
van Bodegraven, A. A.
Dijkstra, G.
Hommes, D. W.
de Jong, D. J.
Stokkers, P. C. F.
van der Woude, C. J.
Vleggaar, F. P.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2009
Reihe/Periodikum: Lutgens , M W M D , Oldenburg , B , Siersema , P D , van Bodegraven , A A , Dijkstra , G , Hommes , D W , de Jong , D J , Stokkers , P C F , van der Woude , C J , Vleggaar , F P & ICC 2009 , ' Colonoscopic surveillance improves survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis in inflammatory bowel disease ' , British Jounal of Cancer , vol. 101 , no. 10 , pp. 1671-1675 . https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605359
Schlagwörter: inflammatory bowel disease / colorectal cancer / surveillance / survival / tumour stage / IBD / CRC / ULCERATIVE-COLITIS / CROHNS COLITIS / POPULATION / METAANALYSIS / NETHERLANDS / GUIDELINES / CARCINOMA / MORTALITY / PROGRAM / COHORT
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27602411
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/eca043e0-e60f-4b2a-a5d0-05253c0093e7

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic surveillance provides the best practical means for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Strong evidence for improved survival from surveillance programmes is sparse. METHOD: The aim of this study was to compare tumour stage and survival of IBD patients with CRC who were a part of a surveillance programme with those who were not. A nationwide pathology database (PALGA (pathologisch anatomisch landelijk geautomatiseerd archief)) was consulted to identify IBD patients with CRC treated in all eight university hospitals in The Netherlands over a period of 15 years. Patients were assigned to the surveillance group when they had undergone one or more surveillance colonoscopies before a diagnosis of CRC. Patients who had not undergone surveillance served as controls. Tumour stage and survival were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients with IBD-associated CRC were identified. Twenty-three had had colonoscopic surveillance before CRC was discovered. The 5-year CRC-related survival rate of patients in the surveillance group was 100% compared with 74% in the non-surveillance group (P = 0.042). In the surveillance group, only one patient died as a consequence of CRC compared with 29 patients in the control group (P = 0.047). In addition, more early tumour stages were found in the surveillance group (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for improved survival from colonoscopic surveillance in IBD patients by detecting CRC at a more favourable tumour stage. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 1671-1675. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605359 www.bjcancer.com Published online 13 October 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK