Quality of life after coronary bypass:a multicentre study of routinely collected health data in the Netherlands†

OBJECTIVES: In this study, our aim was to explore how coronary artery bypass grafting affects quality of life, and how this varies with age, particularly with patients at risk of deterioration. METHODS: In a retrospective, multicentre cohort study, patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and electively operated between January 2011 and January 2015 with pre- and postoperative quality-of-life data were included. Patients were classified into 3 age groups: <65, 65-79 and ≥80 years. Quality of life was measured up to 1-year follow-up using the Short Form-12 or the Short Form-36... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Blokzijl, Fredrike
Houterman, Saskia
van Straten, Bart H M
Daeter, Edgar
Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, George J
Dieperink, Willem
Reneman, Michiel F
Keus, Frederik
van der Horst, Iwan C C
Mariani, Massimo A
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Reihe/Periodikum: Blokzijl , F , Houterman , S , van Straten , B H M , Daeter , E , Brandon Bravo Bruinsma , G J , Dieperink , W , Reneman , M F , Keus , F , van der Horst , I C C & Mariani , M A 2019 , ' Quality of life after coronary bypass : a multicentre study of routinely collected health data in the Netherlands† ' , EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY , vol. 56 , no. 3 , pp. 526-533 . https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz051
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27599727
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/01582af4-c5a4-4fcc-818e-3222501ff47d

OBJECTIVES: In this study, our aim was to explore how coronary artery bypass grafting affects quality of life, and how this varies with age, particularly with patients at risk of deterioration. METHODS: In a retrospective, multicentre cohort study, patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and electively operated between January 2011 and January 2015 with pre- and postoperative quality-of-life data were included. Patients were classified into 3 age groups: <65, 65-79 and ≥80 years. Quality of life was measured up to 1-year follow-up using the Short Form-12 or the Short Form-36 health survey. A multivariable, linear regression analysis, with an adjustment for confounders, was used to evaluate the association between age and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 2606 patients were included in this study. Upon one-year of follow-up, the mean physical health of patients increased from 54 at baseline to 68, and mental health increased from 60 to 67. We observed decreased mental health in 20% of patients aged <65 years, 20% of patients aged 65-79 years and 29% of patients aged ≥80 years (P = 0.039). In this study, age was not associated with a lower physical or mental component score (P = 0.054 and P = 0.13, respectively). Independent risk factors for a decrease in quality of life consist of a better physical and mental score at baseline (P < 0.001) and a reduced left ventricular function (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients experience a relevant increase in physical and mental quality of life, but a proportion of patients aged ≥80 years undergo significant deterioration in mental health.