Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams

Introduction: Curriculum change and innovation are inevitable parts of progress in postgraduate medical education (PGME). Although implementing change is known to be challenging, change management principles are rarely looked at for support. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORE) is a critical precursor for the successful implementation of change initiatives. Therefore, this study explores Wtheater assessing OR( in clinical teaching teams could help to understand how curriculum change takes place in PGME. Methods: Clinical teaching teams in hospitals in the Nethe... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Bank, Lindsay
Jippes, Marielle
Leppinle, Jimmie
Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.
den Rooyens, Corry
van Luijk, Scheltus J.
Scheele, Fedde
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Reihe/Periodikum: Bank , L , Jippes , M , Leppinle , J , Scherpbier , A J J A , den Rooyens , C , van Luijk , S J & Scheele , F 2017 , ' Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams ' , Advances in medical education and practice , vol. 8 , pp. 807-815 . https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146021
Schlagwörter: organizational readiness for change / postgraduate medical education / curriculum change / change management / questionnaire / innovation / POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION / CANMEDS ROLES / NETHERLANDS / COMPETENCES / WORKPLACE / PROGRAM
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27597274
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/9cbf9243-d9bc-4e21-8e25-da44c628a79f

Introduction: Curriculum change and innovation are inevitable parts of progress in postgraduate medical education (PGME). Although implementing change is known to be challenging, change management principles are rarely looked at for support. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORE) is a critical precursor for the successful implementation of change initiatives. Therefore, this study explores Wtheater assessing OR( in clinical teaching teams could help to understand how curriculum change takes place in PGME. Methods: Clinical teaching teams in hospitals in the Netherlands were requested to complete the Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change, a questionnaire to measure OR( in clinical teaching teams. In addition, change-related behavior was measured by using the "behavioral support-for-change" measure. A two-way analysis of variance as performed for all response variables of interest. Results: In total, 836 clinical teaching team members were included in this study: 288 (34.4%) trainees, 307 (36.7%) clinical staff members, and 241 (28.8%) program directors. Overall, items regarding whether the program director has the authority to lead scored higher compared with the other items. At the other end, the subscales "management support and leadership," "project resources," and "implementation plan" had the lowest scores in all groups. Discussion: The study brought to light that program directors are clearly in the lead when it comes to the implementation of educational innovation. Clinical teaching teams tend to work together as a team, sharing responsibilities in the implementation process. However, the results also reinforce the need for change management support in change processes in PGME.