Effects of Vowel Length and Syllable Structure on Segment Duration in Dutch
Three experiments investigated timing patterns in Dutch mono- and bisyllabic words contrasting in vowel length. In Experiment 1, duration of the postvocalic stop consonant in CV(:)C words did not vary as a function of preceding vowel length. Experiment 2 extended this finding tointervocalic stops in bisyllabic CV(:)C~n words. In Dutch, CV:C~n words contain a long vowel in syllable-final position while CVC~n words contain a short vowel followed by an ambisyllabic consonant. Results from Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the intervocalic consonant is not affected by the quantity of the... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | workingPaper |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 1996 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27466220 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://zenodo.org/record/3733523 |
Three experiments investigated timing patterns in Dutch mono- and bisyllabic words contrasting in vowel length. In Experiment 1, duration of the postvocalic stop consonant in CV(:)C words did not vary as a function of preceding vowel length. Experiment 2 extended this finding tointervocalic stops in bisyllabic CV(:)C~n words. In Dutch, CV:C~n words contain a long vowel in syllable-final position while CVC~n words contain a short vowel followed by an ambisyllabic consonant. Results from Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the intervocalic consonant is not affected by the quantity of the preceding vowel or its differential status as a tautosyllabic or ambisyllabic consonant. These results suggest no effect of vowel length on postvocalic consonant duration. However, an additional finding of Experiment 2 was that the duration of second-syllable [~n] is inversely affected by the length of the vowel in the first syllable. Finally, Experiment 3 established that in CV(:)CC~n words, both medial consonants and [~n] were longer when preceded by a short vowel in the first syllable. These findings indicate that the presence of a short vowel results in a compensation of approximately 25-30 ms, which is distributed across all segments following that vowel. It is hypothesized that the postvocalic consonant in Experiments 1 and 2 did not participate in this compensation because the consonant is obligatory following short vowels. Thus, the factor affecting whether or not a postvocalic consonant exhibits compensatory behavior may be not so much ambisyllabicity versus tautosyllabicity but rather its obligatory versus optional status. Implications for models of phonetic and phonological timing are discussed. ; This paper is copyrighted, and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) - see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/