Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield

Abstract Background Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (FHQ) on colorectal cancer (CRC) and Lynch syndrome-associated tumours to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme. Methods Six thousand screen-naive individuals, aged 59–75 years, were invited to complete a FIT (FOB-Gold, cut-off 47 µg Hb/g faeces) and a validated online FHQ. Participants with... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Roos, Victorine H.
Kallenberg, Frank G. J.
van der Vlugt, Manon
Bongers, Evelien J. C.
Aalfs, Cora M.
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Dekker, Evelien
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: British Journal of Cancer ; volume 122, issue 12, page 1865-1871 ; ISSN 0007-0920 1532-1827
Verlag/Hrsg.: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27463686
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8

Abstract Background Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (FHQ) on colorectal cancer (CRC) and Lynch syndrome-associated tumours to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme. Methods Six thousand screen-naive individuals, aged 59–75 years, were invited to complete a FIT (FOB-Gold, cut-off 47 µg Hb/g faeces) and a validated online FHQ. Participants with a positive FIT and/or positive FHQ, confirmed after genetic counselling, were referred for colonoscopy. Yield of detecting AN per 1000 invitees for the combined strategy was compared with the FIT-only strategy. Results Of the 5979 invitees, 1952 (32.6%) completed the FIT only, 2379 (39.8%) completed both the FIT and FHQ and 95 (1.6%) completed the FHQ only. Addition of the FHQ to FIT-based screening resulted in one extra case of AN detected after 16 additional colonoscopies, resulting in a yield of 19.6 (95% CI, 16.4–23.5) for the combined strategy versus 19.5 (95% CI, 16.3–23.3) for the FIT-only strategy ( p = 1.0). Conclusions The addition of an FHQ to one round of FIT screening did not increase the detection of AN compared with FIT only (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698462).