Condities op combineerbaarheid. Het geval van de bepaling van de gesteldheid en de PP

Condities op combineerbaarheid. Het geval van de bepaling van de gesteldheid en de PP Secondary predicates are known to be hybrids. The secondary predicate warm in Jan eet die Hol­landse kroketjes warm is depending both on the VP predicate eet and on the NP die Hollandse kroketjes. It has also been indicated that a secondary predicate can be governed by some types of PP’s. Compare the direct object van die Hollandse kroketjes in Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm with the prepositional object van die Hollandse kroketjes in: *Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm. In the firs... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Pekelder, Jan
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Verlag/Hrsg.: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.
Schlagwörter: Dutch / syntax / secondary predicates / NP / PP / syntactic category / syntactic function
Sprache: Polish
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27458958
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://wuwr.pl/nwr/article/view/3078

Condities op combineerbaarheid. Het geval van de bepaling van de gesteldheid en de PP Secondary predicates are known to be hybrids. The secondary predicate warm in Jan eet die Hol­landse kroketjes warm is depending both on the VP predicate eet and on the NP die Hollandse kroketjes. It has also been indicated that a secondary predicate can be governed by some types of PP’s. Compare the direct object van die Hollandse kroketjes in Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm with the prepositional object van die Hollandse kroketjes in: *Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm. In the first sentence, ‘Jan’ eats an unlimited amount of ‘Dutch croquettes’, while what ‘Jan’ in the second sentence does is eating pieces of unlimited amount of ‘Dutch croquettes’. The difference between the acceptability of the two constructions tends to be analysed in two ways: 1. the first sentence is acceptable because the direct object is in fact not a PP but a NP, which is pre­ceded by a complex determinator van die or 2. the construction is acceptable because it contains a PP which refers to entities. The aim of this paper is to further support the second opinion. ; Condities op combineerbaarheid. Het geval van de bepaling van de gesteldheid en de PPSecondary predicates are known to be hybrids. The secondary predicate warm in Jan eet die Hol­landse kroketjes warm is depending both on the VP predicate eet and on the NP die Hollandse kroketjes. It has also been indicated that a secondary predicate can be governed by some types of PP’s. Compare the direct object van die Hollandse kroketjes in Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm with the prepositional object van die Hollandse kroketjes in: *Jan eet [van die Hollandse kroketjes] PP warm. In the first sentence, ‘Jan’ eats an unlimited amount of ‘Dutch croquettes’, while what ‘Jan’ in the second sentence does is eating pieces of unlimited amount of ‘Dutch croquettes’. The difference between the acceptability of the two constructions tends to be analysed in two ways: 1. the ...