Contested evidence:a Dutch reimbursement decision taken to court

This paper examines a remarkable lawsuit in health care rationing. The Patients Association for Interstitial Cystitis sued the Dutch National Health Care Institute for alleged misconduct against Interstitial Cystitis patients, as the Institute decided that bladder instillations with chondroitin sulphate or hyaluronic acid are no longer covered by the basic health insurance. The patients' organisation challenged the Institute for basing its standpoint on scientific evidence; overruling clinical expertise and patients' experiences. While scientific advice is often solicited in public health issu... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Moes, Floortje
Houwaart, Eddy
Delnoij, Diana
Horstman, Klasien
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Reihe/Periodikum: Moes , F , Houwaart , E , Delnoij , D & Horstman , K 2017 , ' Contested evidence : a Dutch reimbursement decision taken to court ' , Health Economics, Policy and Law , vol. 12 , no. 3 , pp. 325-344 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133116000281
Schlagwörter: CYSTITIS/BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME / SODIUM CHONDROITIN SULFATE / NATIONAL-HEALTH-SERVICE / INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS / VEHICLE CONTROL / DOUBLE-BLIND / NETHERLANDS / CARE / MULTICENTER / INSURANCE
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27439933
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/5e42522f-84e8-4dab-9888-443ac8c27712