Factor loadings from 5 factor correlated factors model.

CSS = COVID Stress Scale Item; F1…F5 = Factors 1 through 5. Models fit using weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment (WLSMV) estimation. The rotation targets for items not associated with a factor were set to 0. Factor correlations ranged from r = .31 to .82 (average r = .54) in the Polish sample, and from r = .43 to .75 (average r = .57) in the Dutch sample. Model fit for the Polish sample was: χ 2 = 3447.67, df = 584, p < .01; RMSEA = .094; SRMR = .08; CFI = .919; TLI = .912. Model fit for the Dutch sample was: χ 2 = 1720.01, df = 585, p < .01; RMSEA = .071; SRMR = .07... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Katarzyna Adamczyk (9573135)
D. Angus Clark (5130482)
Julia Pradelok (11778254)
Dokumenttyp: Text
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Schlagwörter: Medicine / Science Policy / Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / used data collected / obsessive compulsive symptoms / also positively related / validity &lt;/ p / largely invariant across / css &# 8217 / covid stress scales / measure stress / xlink \ / &gt; / results suggest / psychometrically robust / psychometric properties / psychometric functioning / measurement invariance / language version / lags considered / future investigations / factor structure / external associations / dutch translations / 19 vaccine / 19 pandemic / 19 fear
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27438396
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260459.s010

CSS = COVID Stress Scale Item; F1…F5 = Factors 1 through 5. Models fit using weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment (WLSMV) estimation. The rotation targets for items not associated with a factor were set to 0. Factor correlations ranged from r = .31 to .82 (average r = .54) in the Polish sample, and from r = .43 to .75 (average r = .57) in the Dutch sample. Model fit for the Polish sample was: χ 2 = 3447.67, df = 584, p < .01; RMSEA = .094; SRMR = .08; CFI = .919; TLI = .912. Model fit for the Dutch sample was: χ 2 = 1720.01, df = 585, p < .01; RMSEA = .071; SRMR = .076; CFI = .937; TLI = .933. Dutch sample has one extra degree of freedom because the factor loading for CSS-10 was fixed to .98 to avoid convergence with negative residual variances. (DOCX)