Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis

Objective To assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme. Design All individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screening in 2019 and 2020 were included using individual-level data. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between either the different time periods (ie, ‘ before ’, ‘ during ’ and ‘ after ’ the first COVID-19 wave) or the invitation interval on screen-detected and in... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
de Jonge, Lucie
van Iersel, Carola Adriana
Spaander, Manon C W
van Vuuren, Anneke J
van Kemenade, Folkert
Ramakers, Christian R
Dekker, Evelien
Nagetaal, Iris D
van Leerdam, Monique E
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Dokumenttyp: TEXT
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Verlag/Hrsg.: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Schlagwörter: Colon
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27411345
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://gut.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/7/1319

Objective To assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme. Design All individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screening in 2019 and 2020 were included using individual-level data. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between either the different time periods (ie, ‘ before ’, ‘ during ’ and ‘ after ’ the first COVID-19 wave) or the invitation interval on screen-detected and interval CRCs. Results Positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia (AN) was slightly lower during (OR=0.91) and after (OR=0.95) the first COVID-19 wave, but no significant difference was observed for the different invitation intervals. Out of all individuals that previously tested negative, 84 (0.004%) had an interval CRC beyond the 24 months since their last invitation. The time period of invitation as well as the extended invitation interval was not associated with detection rates for AN and interval CRC rate. Conclusion The impact of the first COVID-19 wave on screening yield was modest. A very small proportion of the FIT negatives had an interval CRC possibly due to an extended interval, which potentially could have been prevented if they had received the invitation earlier. Nonetheless, no increase in interval CRC rate was observed, indicating that an extended invitation interval up to 30 months had no negative impact on the performance of the CRC screening programme and a modest extension of the invitation interval seems an appropriate intervention.