An EU Perspective on Age as a Distinguishing Criterion for Collective Dismissal: The Case of Belgium and The Netherlands

As a result of the economic crisis in the European Union, many companies have been forced to reorganize their activities in an attempt to cope with the substantial difficulties they face. Collective dismissals may be the ultimum remedium for the company to survive. This article considers whether an employer can dismiss an employee, merely based on age and, more specifically, pursuant to national legislation containing an age-pyramid principle (Belgium) or mirror-principle (the Netherlands). EU legislation and case law on discrimination on the basis of age are analysed to establish whether age... Mehr ...

Verfasser: FOUBERT, Petra
LANGHENDRIES, Els
MAROCCHI, Nilde
PEETERS, Johan
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2013
Schlagwörter: Economic Crisis / Collective Dismissals / Age Discrimination / EU / Comparative Law / Belgian Age-Pyramid Principle / Dutch Mirror-Principle
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27381034
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://hdl.handle.net/1942/16046

As a result of the economic crisis in the European Union, many companies have been forced to reorganize their activities in an attempt to cope with the substantial difficulties they face. Collective dismissals may be the ultimum remedium for the company to survive. This article considers whether an employer can dismiss an employee, merely based on age and, more specifically, pursuant to national legislation containing an age-pyramid principle (Belgium) or mirror-principle (the Netherlands). EU legislation and case law on discrimination on the basis of age are analysed to establish whether age can be used as a criterion to distinguish among employees within the framework of collective dismissals. Since the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) judgment in Odar, age-based measures taken by the social partners to ensure the survival of the undertaking would appear to be acceptable, in line with a more substantive approach to equality. However, a number of critical points need to be examined in this respect,such as whether the social partners can act as institutions promoting equality of all kinds.