Opportunities and barriers for prehospital emergency medical services research in the Netherlands; results of a mixed-methods consensus study

Abstract Introduction Quality improvement in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) can only be achieved by high-quality research and critical appraisal of current practices. This study examines current opportunities and barriers in EMS research in the Netherlands. Methods This mixed-methods consensus study consisted of three phases. The first phase consisted of semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders. Thematic analysis of qualitative data derived from these interviews was used to identify main themes, which were subsequently discussed in several online focus groups in the... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Vianen, Niek J.
Maissan, Iscander M.
den Hartog, Dennis
Stolker, Robert J.
Houmes, Robert J.
Gommers, Diederik A. M. P. J.
Van Meeteren, Nico L. U.
Hoeks, Sanne E.
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
Van Vledder, Mark G.
Alsma, Jelmer
Baden, David N.
Bevelander, Timo
Bierens, Joost
Bollen, Jan
Bosch, Jan
Dercksen, Bert
Duvekot, Johannes J.
Gaakeer, Menno I.
van Geffen, Geert-Jan
Geurts, Dorien H. F.
van Grunsven, Pierre M.
van Heijl, Mark
van ’t Hof, Arnoud
Hollmann, Markus W.
Hoogerwerf, Nico
Huig, Isabelle C.
Kooij, Fabian
de Leeuw, Marcel A.
van der Marel, Caroline D.
Morsink, Marlies
Noordergraaf, Gerrit J.
van de Pas, Harm
Peters, Joost H.
Poeze, Martijn
Richelle, Paul
Roozenbeek, Bob
Schober, Patrick
Schoonhoven, Lisette
van Schuppen, Hans
Siegers, Arjen
Tibboel, Dick
Tolsma, Rudolf T.
Turner, Nigel M.
de Visser, Matthijs
Vloet, Lilian C. M.
de Vos, Ronald
van Wageningen, Bas
van der Weerd, Angelique
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery ; ISSN 1863-9933 1863-9941
Verlag/Hrsg.: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Schlagwörter: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine / Orthopedics and Sports Medicine / Emergency Medicine / Surgery
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27235619
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02240-w

Abstract Introduction Quality improvement in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) can only be achieved by high-quality research and critical appraisal of current practices. This study examines current opportunities and barriers in EMS research in the Netherlands. Methods This mixed-methods consensus study consisted of three phases. The first phase consisted of semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders. Thematic analysis of qualitative data derived from these interviews was used to identify main themes, which were subsequently discussed in several online focus groups in the second phase. Output from these discussions was used to shape statements for an online Delphi consensus study among relevant stakeholders in EMS research. Consensus was met if 80% of respondents agreed or disagreed on a particular statement. Results Forty-nine stakeholders participated in the study; qualitative thematic analysis of the interviews and focus group discussions identified four main themes: (1) data registration and data sharing, (2) laws and regulations, (3) financial aspects and funding, and (4) organization and culture. Qualitative data from the first two phases of the study were used to construct 33 statements for an online Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 21 (64%) statements. Eleven (52%) of these statements pertained to the storage and use of EMS patient data. Conclusion Barriers for prehospital EMS research in the Netherlands include issues regarding the use of patient data, privacy and legislation, funding and research culture in EMS organizations. Opportunities to increase scientific productivity in EMS research include the development of a national strategy for EMS data and the incorporation of EMS topics in research agendas of national medical professional associations.