Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency

In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but als... Mehr ...

Verfasser: van de Sande, Jolien
de Graaff, Bert
Delnoij, Diana
de Bont, Antoinette
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Reihe/Periodikum: Administration & Society ; volume 54, issue 6, page 1178-1206 ; ISSN 0095-3997 1552-3039
Verlag/Hrsg.: SAGE Publications
Schlagwörter: Marketing / Public Administration / Sociology and Political Science
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27235164
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00953997211057056

In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.