Assessing the clinical benefit of systemic anti-cancer treatments in the Netherlands:The impact of different thresholds for effectiveness

Background: In the Netherlands, the clinical benefit of systemic anti-cancer treatments (SACTs) is assessed by the Committee for the Evaluation of Oncological Agents (cieBOM). For non-curative SACTs, the assessment is based on the hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival and/or overall survival (OS), and the difference in median survival. We evaluated the impact of different thresholds for effectiveness by reassessing the clinical benefit of SACTs. Methods: We reassessed SACTs that were initially assessed by cieBOM between 2015 and 2017. Four scenarios were formulated: replacing an “OR”... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Leeneman, Brenda
Xander, Nicolas S. H.
Fiets, W. Edward
de Jong, Wouter K.
Uyl, Nathalie E. M.
Wymenga, A. N. Machteld
Reyners, An K. L.
Uyl-de Groot, Carin A.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Reihe/Periodikum: Leeneman , B , Xander , N S H , Fiets , W E , de Jong , W K , Uyl , N E M , Wymenga , A N M , Reyners , A K L & Uyl-de Groot , C A 2024 , ' Assessing the clinical benefit of systemic anti-cancer treatments in the Netherlands : The impact of different thresholds for effectiveness ' , European Journal of Cancer , vol. 202 , 114002 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114002
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27232785
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vumc.nl/en/publications/77cd6fae-497d-4436-aa39-40c25de0279b