In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder

We assess Radder’s criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.

Verfasser: de Ridder, Jeroen
Bouter, Lex
Haven, Tamarinde
Peels, Rik
Tijdink, Joeri
Zeegers, Maurice P.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: de Ridder , J , Bouter , L , Haven , T , Peels , R , Tijdink , J & Zeegers , M P 2023 , ' In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder ' , Accountability in Research , vol. 30 , no. 5 , pp. 276-283 . https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599
Schlagwörter: Mertonian norms / Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity / patenting / Research Integrity / Responsible research and innovation / /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions / name=SDG 16 - Peace / Justice and Strong Institutions
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27231520
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/abb83902-138a-4073-a852-40a5779e474c