General practitioners’ views on cardiovascular prevention for ethnic minorities—a qualitative study in the Netherlands

Abstract Objectives While ethnic minorities in Europe are disproportionally affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD), little is known about how general practitioners (GPs) perceive differences in risk or care needs across ethnic minority groups. Therefore, we explored GPs’ views on whether ethnicity influences cardiovascular risk, whether a culturally sensitive approach is warranted, on potential barriers in the provision of such care, and to find potential opportunities to improve cardiovascular prevention for these groups. Methods We conducted a qualitative study by interviewing GPs practisi... Mehr ...

Verfasser: van Apeldoorn, Joshua A N
Roozekrans, Alet K
Harskamp, Ralf E
Richard, Edo
Agyemang, Charles
Moll van Charante, Eric P
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: Family Practice ; ISSN 1460-2229
Verlag/Hrsg.: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Schlagwörter: Family Practice
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27227734
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmad030

Abstract Objectives While ethnic minorities in Europe are disproportionally affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD), little is known about how general practitioners (GPs) perceive differences in risk or care needs across ethnic minority groups. Therefore, we explored GPs’ views on whether ethnicity influences cardiovascular risk, whether a culturally sensitive approach is warranted, on potential barriers in the provision of such care, and to find potential opportunities to improve cardiovascular prevention for these groups. Methods We conducted a qualitative study by interviewing GPs practising in The Netherlands. The interviews were semistructured, audio-recorded, and analysed by 2 researchers using thematic analysis. Results We interviewed 24 Dutch GPs (50% male). GPs’ views on the impact of ethnicity on CVD risk varied widely, yet it was generally recognized as a relevant factor in cardiovascular prevention for most minority groups, prompting earlier case-finding of high-risk patients. While GPs were aware of sociocultural differences, they emphasized an individualized approach. Perceived limitations were language barriers and unfamiliarity with sociocultural customs, leading to a need for continuing medical education on culturally sensitive care and reimbursement of telephone interpreting services. Conclusion Dutch GPs have differing views on the role of ethnicity in evaluating and treating cardiovascular risk. Despite these differences, they emphasized the importance of a personalized and culturally sensitive approach during patient consultations and expressed a need for continuing medical education. Additional research on how ethnicity influences CVD risk may strengthen cardiovascular prevention in increasingly diverse primary care populations.