Stimulating spatial quality? Unpacking the approach of the province of Friesland, the Netherlands

The article introduces the concepts of robustness and flexibility into the discussion on spatial quality to unpack the approach adopted by the Dutch province of Friesland in pursuit of their ambition to stimulate spatial quality. The analysis of how robustness and flexibility are manifested in Friesland, respectively the capacity to counteract negative impacts on spatial quality and the capacity to progress to more enhanced forms of spatial quality, reveals a multi-component, dynamic and selective approach. Multi-component refers to the combination of regulations, the building of purposeful or... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Hartman, Stefan
Parra, Constanza
de Roo, Gert
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Reihe/Periodikum: Hartman , S , Parra , C & de Roo , G 2016 , ' Stimulating spatial quality? Unpacking the approach of the province of Friesland, the Netherlands ' , European Planning Studies , vol. 24 , no. 2 , pp. 297-315 . https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1080229
Schlagwörter: Spatial quality / robust / flexible / governance / decision-making / POST-PRODUCTIVISM / SUSTAINABILITY / CONSUMPTION / LANDSCAPES / EXPERIENCE / MORVAN
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27210721
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/a851aa25-e0c0-4268-aa51-2bc6f2a0ebbc

The article introduces the concepts of robustness and flexibility into the discussion on spatial quality to unpack the approach adopted by the Dutch province of Friesland in pursuit of their ambition to stimulate spatial quality. The analysis of how robustness and flexibility are manifested in Friesland, respectively the capacity to counteract negative impacts on spatial quality and the capacity to progress to more enhanced forms of spatial quality, reveals a multi-component, dynamic and selective approach. Multi-component refers to the combination of regulations, the building of purposeful organizations and teams and deliberate actions to influence spatial development projects and plans. It is dynamic because the approach is adapted to the dynamics of the multilevel governance system wherein the province and its actions are embedded. It is selective because spatial quality is reduced to a limited set of factors, decision-making is done by a selected set of actors and some measures tend to address a limited set of themes. The findings suggest that stimulating spatial quality strongly depends on how spatial quality is conceptualized and formalized in the arena of politics and planning, negotiated in multilevel decision-making processes alongside decisions on whether to make resources available for this purpose.