Regional practice variation in induction of labor in the Netherlands:Does it matter? A multilevel analysis of the association between induction rates and perinatal and maternal outcomes

Background Practice variation in healthcare is a complex issue. We focused on practice variation in induction of labor between maternity care networks in the Netherlands. These collaborations of hospitals and midwifery practices are jointly responsible for providing high-quality maternity care. We explored the association between induction rates and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods In a retrospective population-based cohort study, we included records of 184,422 women who had a singleton, vertex birth of their first child after a gestation of at least 37 weeks in the years 2016–2018. We... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Offerhaus, Pien
van Haaren-Ten Haken, Tamar M.
Keulen, Judit K.J.
de Jong, Judith D.
Brabers, Anne E.M.
Verhoeven, Corine J.M.
Scheepers, Hubertina C.J.
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: Offerhaus , P , van Haaren-Ten Haken , T M , Keulen , J K J , de Jong , J D , Brabers , A E M , Verhoeven , C J M , Scheepers , H C J & Nieuwenhuijze , M 2023 , ' Regional practice variation in induction of labor in the Netherlands : Does it matter? A multilevel analysis of the association between induction rates and perinatal and maternal outcomes ' , PLoS ONE , vol. 18 , e0286863 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286863
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27210089
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/624d8506-55d2-4353-bffb-cb8456efbded

Background Practice variation in healthcare is a complex issue. We focused on practice variation in induction of labor between maternity care networks in the Netherlands. These collaborations of hospitals and midwifery practices are jointly responsible for providing high-quality maternity care. We explored the association between induction rates and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods In a retrospective population-based cohort study, we included records of 184,422 women who had a singleton, vertex birth of their first child after a gestation of at least 37 weeks in the years 2016–2018. We calculated induction rates for each maternity care network. We divided networks in induction rate categories: lowest (Q1), moderate (Q2-3) and highest quartile (Q4). We explored the association of these categories with unplanned caesarean sections, unfavorable maternal outcomes and adverse perinatal outcomes using descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression analysis corrected for population characteristics. Findings The induction rate ranged from 14.3% to 41.1% (mean 24.4%, SD 5.3). Women in Q1 had fewer unplanned caesarean sections (Q1: 10.2%, Q2-3: 12.1%; Q4: 12.8%), less unfavorable maternal outcomes (Q1: 33.8%; Q2-3: 35.7%; Q4: 36.3%) and less adverse perinatal outcomes (Q1: 1.0%; Q2-3: 1.1%; Q4: 1.3%). The multilevel analysis showed a lower unplanned caesarean section rate in Q1 in comparison with reference category Q2-3 (OR 0.83; p = .009). The unplanned caesarean section rate in Q4 was similar to the reference category. No significant associations with unfavorable maternal or adverse perinatal outcomes were observed. Conclusion Practice variation in labor induction is high in Dutch maternity care networks, with limited association with maternal outcomes and no association with perinatal outcomes. Networks with low induction rates had lower unplanned caesarean section rates compared to networks with moderate rates. Further in-depth research is necessary to understand the mechanisms that contribute to ...