Reported barriers to evaluation in chronic care: experiences in six European countries

INTRODUCTION: The growing movement of innovative approaches to chronic disease management in Europe has not been matched by a corresponding effort to evaluate them. This paper discusses challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management as reported by experts in six European countries. METHODS: We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with key informants from Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain involved in decision-making and implementation of chronic disease management approaches. Interviews were complemented by a survey on approaches to chronic disease manageme... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Knai, Cécile
Nolte, Ellen
Brunn, Matthias
Elissen, Arianne
Conklin, Annalijn
Pedersen, Janice Pedersen
Brereton, Laura
Erler, Antje
Frølich, Anne
Flamm, Maria
Fullerton, Birgitte
Jacobsen, Ramune
Krohn, Robert
Saz-Parkinson, ZuleiKa
Vrijhoef, Bert
Chevreul, Karine
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Farsi, Fadila
Sarria-Santamera, Antonio
Soennichsen, Andreas
Dokumenttyp: journal article
Erscheinungsdatum: 2013
Verlag/Hrsg.: Health policy
Schlagwörter: Austria / Chronic Disease / Delivery of Health Care / Denmark / France / Germany / Humans / Netherlands / Quality of Health Care / Spain / Evaluation Studies as Topic
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27197296
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/5887

INTRODUCTION: The growing movement of innovative approaches to chronic disease management in Europe has not been matched by a corresponding effort to evaluate them. This paper discusses challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management as reported by experts in six European countries. METHODS: We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with key informants from Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain involved in decision-making and implementation of chronic disease management approaches. Interviews were complemented by a survey on approaches to chronic disease management in each country. Finally two project teams (France and the Netherlands) conducted in-depth case studies on various aspects of chronic care evaluation. RESULTS: We identified three common challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management approaches: (1) a lack of evaluation culture and related shortage of capacity; (2) reluctance of payers or providers to engage in evaluation and (3) practical challenges around data and the heterogeity of IT infrastructure. The ability to evaluate chronic disease management interventions is influenced by contextual and cultural factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to our understanding of some of the most common underlying barriers to chronic care evaluation by highlighting the views and experiences of stakeholders and experts in six European countries. Overcoming the cultural, political and structural barriers to evaluation should be driven by payers and providers, for example by building in incentives such as feedback on performance, aligning financial incentives with programme objectives, collectively participating in designing an appropriate framework for evaluation, and making data use and accessibility consistent with data protection policies. ; The DISMEVAL project was funded under the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) (grant no. 223277). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and the European Commission is therefore not ...