Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: Comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands

Background: Disproportionate regulation of health and medical research contributes to research waste. Better understanding of exemptions of research from ethics review in different jurisdictions may help to guide modification of review processes and reduce research waste. Our aim was to identify examples of low-risk human health and medical research exempt from ethics reviews in Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands. Methods: We examined documents providing national guidance on research ethics in each country, including those authored by the National Health and M... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Scott, Anna Mae
Kolstoe, Simon
Ploem, M. C.(corrette)
Hammatt, Zoë
Glasziou, Paul
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Scott , A M , Kolstoe , S , Ploem , M C , Hammatt , Z & Glasziou , P 2020 , ' Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: Comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands ' , Health Research Policy and Systems , vol. 18 , no. 1 , 11 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0520-4
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27179599
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.bond.edu.au/en/publications/1b1e3198-1d95-459a-834c-441b6ed88c37