Prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1:Results from the DutchMEN1 Study Group

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) is unknown. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the Dutch National MEN1 database, which includes >90% of the Dutch MEN1 population with data collected between 1990 and 2014. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks from the largest resected PanNET per patient were collected. MIB1 staining was performed and KI67 labeling index (LI) was determined by manual eye-counting under a microscope and by digital image analysis. Mitotic cou... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Conemans, Elfi B
Brosens, Lodewijk A A
Raicu-Ionita, Gabriela M
Pieterman, Carolina R C
de Herder, Wouter W
Dekkers, Olaf M
Hermus, Ad R
van der Horst-Schrivers, Anouk N
Bisschop, Peter H
Havekes, Bas
Drent, Madeleine L
Timmers, H Th Marc
Offerhaus, G Johan
Valk, Gerlof D
Vriens, Menno R
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Reihe/Periodikum: Conemans , E B , Brosens , L A A , Raicu-Ionita , G M , Pieterman , C R C , de Herder , W W , Dekkers , O M , Hermus , A R , van der Horst-Schrivers , A N , Bisschop , P H , Havekes , B , Drent , M L , Timmers , H T M , Offerhaus , G J , Valk , G D & Vriens , M R 2017 , ' Prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 : Results from the DutchMEN1 Study Group ' , Pancreatology , vol. 17 , no. 5 , pp. 766-772 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.196
Schlagwörter: Journal Article / /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being / name=SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27075485
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/f12d6296-2889-43aa-8a68-c165894c79a0

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) is unknown. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the Dutch National MEN1 database, which includes >90% of the Dutch MEN1 population with data collected between 1990 and 2014. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks from the largest resected PanNET per patient were collected. MIB1 staining was performed and KI67 labeling index (LI) was determined by manual eye-counting under a microscope and by digital image analysis. Mitotic count was evaluated from hematoxylin & eosin stains. Association between WHO grade and (time until) development of liver metastases was calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-nine MEN1 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were included. Ten patients (14%) developed liver metastases and all had PanNETs ≥3 cm. WHO G1, G2 and G3 PanNETs were seen in 83% (n = 57), 16% (n = 11) and 1% (n = 1) respectively. In non-functioning PanNETs >2 cm, liver metastases occurred in 80% of WHO G2 PanNETs (4/5) compared to 23% (5/22) in WHO G1 PanNETs (p = 0.03) when WHO grade was based on mitotic count only. This significant association was not seen for WHO grade based on Ki67 LI. After five years, liver metastases in non-functioning PanNETs were not seen in tumors ≤2 cm, in 10% of the large WHO G1 (according to mitotic count only) tumors and in 60% of large WHO G2 tumors (p-value 0.000). CONCLUSION: High mitotic count is correlated with poor prognosis in MEN1 patients with large non-functioning PanNETs.