How (not) to be held accountable in research:The case of the Dutch integrity code

The article starts with a concise explanation of the nature and role of values and norms. I emphasize the ethical and political importance of making explicit how values are interpreted and which norms are taken to advance them in concrete situations. Next, I apply this account in a critical examination of the recent Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. The conclusion is that this code is based on a flawed conception and an inadequate analysis of the nature and role of values and norms in science. Finally, I briefly sketch how the defects of the integrity code might be remedied b... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Radder, Hans
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: Radder , H 2023 , ' How (not) to be held accountable in research : The case of the Dutch integrity code ' , Accountability in Research , vol. 30 , no. 5 , pp. 261-275 . https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2115888
Schlagwörter: Netherlands integrity code / norms / public-interest science / research ethics and politics / Values
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27075206
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/b36507fc-422f-466f-b03b-fd0e278e361f

The article starts with a concise explanation of the nature and role of values and norms. I emphasize the ethical and political importance of making explicit how values are interpreted and which norms are taken to advance them in concrete situations. Next, I apply this account in a critical examination of the recent Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. The conclusion is that this code is based on a flawed conception and an inadequate analysis of the nature and role of values and norms in science. Finally, I briefly sketch how the defects of the integrity code might be remedied by developing policies based on the broader notion of the public interest of science.