Deriving verb-cluster variation in Dutch and German

The difference in West-Germanic V(erb)-clusters, right-branching (Dutch) and left-branching (German), follows from a difference in the acquisition of V-second. That decisive factor had already been acquired before any V-cluster appeared in the child’s speech. Longitudinal Dutch child data show that modals and aspectuals develop a rightward selection that carries over into the V-cluster. The German child data do not show such a development. Automatic phrasal formation by the acquisition procedure may yield the V-cluster without assuming V-movement from an underlying structure. The minor order v... Mehr ...

Verfasser: van Kampen, N.J.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Schlagwörter: West-Germanic V-clusters / harmonic order / V-second acquisition / non-movement analysis
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27068533
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/339376

The difference in West-Germanic V(erb)-clusters, right-branching (Dutch) and left-branching (German), follows from a difference in the acquisition of V-second. That decisive factor had already been acquired before any V-cluster appeared in the child’s speech. Longitudinal Dutch child data show that modals and aspectuals develop a rightward selection that carries over into the V-cluster. The German child data do not show such a development. Automatic phrasal formation by the acquisition procedure may yield the V-cluster without assuming V-movement from an underlying structure. The minor order variations in Dutch triple V-clusters can be accounted for given the previously acquired binary V-clusters. The general perspective is that the acquisition procedure is a discovery procedure. Typological effects are the outcome of early local string-determined licensing/selection.