Dutch judicial entrepreneurship towards legitimizing intellectual property rights

In its recent judgment in the Sisvel v. Xiaomi case, the Court of Appeal of the Hague has demonstrated how European national legal systems and judiciary therein strive to uphold legitimacy of the intellectual property system. Involving dimensions of both substantive patent law and competition law, the case emphasized proportionality etched in European Union law to determine the legitimate cohesive balance for stakeholder economic interests in the protection, enforcement and use of intellectual property rights. This case note documents the salient features of the judgment and further comments o... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Jayaraman, Krishnamani
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law ; volume 27, issue 5, page 684-694 ; ISSN 1023-263X 2399-5548
Verlag/Hrsg.: SAGE Publications
Schlagwörter: Law / Political Science and International Relations
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27062840
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1023263x20954627

In its recent judgment in the Sisvel v. Xiaomi case, the Court of Appeal of the Hague has demonstrated how European national legal systems and judiciary therein strive to uphold legitimacy of the intellectual property system. Involving dimensions of both substantive patent law and competition law, the case emphasized proportionality etched in European Union law to determine the legitimate cohesive balance for stakeholder economic interests in the protection, enforcement and use of intellectual property rights. This case note documents the salient features of the judgment and further comments on striking legal concepts that marked the case.