Standardized ADOS Scores:Measuring Severity of Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Dutch Sample

The validity of the calibrated severity scores on the ADOS as reported by Gotham et al. (J Autism Dev Disord 39: 693-705, 2009), was investigated in an independent sample of 1248 Dutch children with 1455 ADOS administrations (modules 1, 2 and 3). The greater comparability between ADOS administrations at different times, ages and in different modules, as reached by Gotham et al. with the calibrated severity measures, seems to be corroborated by the current study for module 1 and to a lesser extent for module 3. For module 2, the calibrated severity scores need to be further investigated within... Mehr ...

Verfasser: de Bildt, Annelies
Oosterling, Iris J.
van Lang, Natasja D. J.
Sytema, Sjoerd
Minderaa, Ruud B.
van Engeland, Herman
Roos, Sascha
Buitelaar, Jan K.
van der Gaag, Rutger-Jan
de Jonge, Maretha V.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2011
Reihe/Periodikum: de Bildt , A , Oosterling , I J , van Lang , N D J , Sytema , S , Minderaa , R B , van Engeland , H , Roos , S , Buitelaar , J K , van der Gaag , R-J & de Jonge , M V 2011 , ' Standardized ADOS Scores : Measuring Severity of Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Dutch Sample ' , Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , vol. 41 , no. 3 , pp. 311-319 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1057-0
Schlagwörter: ADOS / Autism / ASD / Diagnosis / Symptoms / Severity / DIAGNOSTIC-OBSERVATION-SCHEDULE / REVISED ALGORITHMS / ADOLESCENTS / CHILDREN
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27058869
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/758d4f88-d2ba-4c19-bbff-8de23f2c7442

The validity of the calibrated severity scores on the ADOS as reported by Gotham et al. (J Autism Dev Disord 39: 693-705, 2009), was investigated in an independent sample of 1248 Dutch children with 1455 ADOS administrations (modules 1, 2 and 3). The greater comparability between ADOS administrations at different times, ages and in different modules, as reached by Gotham et al. with the calibrated severity measures, seems to be corroborated by the current study for module 1 and to a lesser extent for module 3. For module 2, the calibrated severity scores need to be further investigated within a sample that resembles Gotham's sample in age and level of verbal functioning.