Indispensability and comprehensiveness results of the 1 st Delphi round.

The proportion of panellists rating each of the 5 Likert scale points for ‘Indispensability (‘none’, ‘low’, ‘medium’, ‘high’, ‘very high’) of each individual EPA and ‘Comprehensiveness’ (‘strongly disagree’, ‘disagree’,’ neither disagree nor agree’, ‘agree’, ‘strongly agree’) of the set as a whole in round 1 are shown. The dotted red line shows the threshold value of 80%, all ratings to the left of this line should either be ‘high/agree’ (light green) or ‘very high/strongly agree’ (dark green) to indicate sufficient content validity.

Verfasser: Marije P. Hennus (6636773)
Anneliese Nusmeier (10325950)
Gwen G. M. van Heesch (10325953)
Maaike A. Riedijk (10325956)
Nikki J. Schoenmaker (10325959)
Marijn Soeteman (10325962)
Enno D. Wildschut (6939266)
Tim Fawns (4670755)
Olle Ten Cate (10325965)
Dokumenttyp: Image
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Schlagwörter: Biophysics / Biochemistry / Medicine / Developmental Biology / Science Policy / Infectious Diseases / Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / PICU fellowship program directors / task force members / EPA / Delphi study Entrustable / round / PICU physicians / Dutch PICU fellows / content validity index / CVI / Dutch PICU physicians
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27049842
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248565.g002