Prediction models to identify workers at risk of sick leave due to low-back pain in the Dutch construction industry

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model based on variables measured in occupational health checks to identify non-sick listed workers at risk of sick leave due to non-specific low-back pain (LBP). METHODS: This cohort study comprised manual (N=22 648) and non-manual (N=9735) construction workers who participated in occupational health checks between 2010 and 2013. Occupational health check variables were used as potential predictors and LBP sick leave was recorded during 1-year follow-up. The prediction model was developed with logistic regression analysis among the... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Lisa C Bosman
Lyan Dijkstra
Catelijne I Joling
Martijn W Heymans
Jos WR Twisk
Corné AM Roelen
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Reihe/Periodikum: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, Vol 44, Iss 2, Pp 156-162 (2018)
Verlag/Hrsg.: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
Schlagwörter: risk assessment / absenteeism / pain / musculoskeletal disease / construction industry / prediction model / prognostic research / roc analysis / low-back pain / sick leave / construction / worker / Public aspects of medicine / RA1-1270
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27018587
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3703

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model based on variables measured in occupational health checks to identify non-sick listed workers at risk of sick leave due to non-specific low-back pain (LBP). METHODS: This cohort study comprised manual (N=22 648) and non-manual (N=9735) construction workers who participated in occupational health checks between 2010 and 2013. Occupational health check variables were used as potential predictors and LBP sick leave was recorded during 1-year follow-up. The prediction model was developed with logistic regression analysis among the manual construction workers and validated in non-manual construction workers. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated with explained variances (Nagelkerke’s R-square), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve, AUC) measures. RESULTS: During follow-up, 178 (0.79%) manual and 17 (0.17%) non-manual construction workers reported LBP sick leave. Backward selection resulted in a model with pain/stiffness in the back, physician-diagnosed musculoskeletal disorders/injuries, postural physical demands, feeling healthy, vitality, and organization of work as predictor variables. The Nagelkerke’s R-square was 3.6%; calibration was adequate, but discrimination was poor (AUC=0.692; 95% CI 0.568–0.815). CONCLUSIONS: A prediction model based on occupational health check variables does not identify non-sick listed workers at increased risk of LBP sick leave correctly. The model could be used to exclude the workers at the lowest risk on LBP sick leave from costly preventive interventions.