The Moralisation of Citizenship in Dutch Integration Discourse

In this essay two arguments are made about the Dutch integration policy discourse drawing on a distinction between formal citizenship and moral citizenship. First it is argued that citizenship is increasingly framed as moral citizenship and subsequently that this entails a shift from actual citizenship to a virtual conception of it. This virtualisation of citizenship leads to the discursive articulation of certain citizens – immigrants who are citizens in the formal sense – as quasi-subjects, at once protected and feared within the nation-state. This entails that the virtualisation of citi... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Willem Schinkel
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2008
Reihe/Periodikum: Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 15-26 (2008)
Verlag/Hrsg.: Amsterdam Law Forum
Schlagwörter: migration / inclusion / exclusion / philosophy / derrida / deconstruction / immigration / asylum law / integration / politics / Law / K
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27017070
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doaj.org/article/142f1ee3ea2f4922ac4876679bd051cd

In this essay two arguments are made about the Dutch integration policy discourse drawing on a distinction between formal citizenship and moral citizenship. First it is argued that citizenship is increasingly framed as moral citizenship and subsequently that this entails a shift from actual citizenship to a virtual conception of it. This virtualisation of citizenship leads to the discursive articulation of certain citizens – immigrants who are citizens in the formal sense – as quasi-subjects, at once protected and feared within the nation-state. This entails that the virtualisation of citizenship does not concern formal inclusion in the nation-state, but rather the moral inclusion in the discursive domain of ‘society’.