Involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: Results from the Netherlands and Belgium

Abstract Aims and objectives To gain insight into the request, use and associated factors of involuntary treatment in people with dementia (PwD) receiving professional home care in the Netherlands and Belgium. Background Most of the PwD remain living at home as long as possible. Due to complex care needs, this can result in an increased risk for care provided against the wishes of the client and/or to which the client resists, referred to as involuntary treatment. Design Secondary data analyses of two cross‐sectional surveys. Methods Dementia case managers and district nurses filled in a quest... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Mengelers, Angela M. H. J.
Moermans, Vincent R. A.
Bleijlevens, Michel H. C.
Verbeek, Hilde
Capezuti, Elizabeth
Tan, Frans
Milisen, Koen
Hamers, Jan P. H.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Journal of Clinical Nursing ; volume 31, issue 13-14, page 1998-2007 ; ISSN 0962-1067 1365-2702
Verlag/Hrsg.: Wiley
Schlagwörter: General Medicine / General Nursing
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26998079
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15457

Abstract Aims and objectives To gain insight into the request, use and associated factors of involuntary treatment in people with dementia (PwD) receiving professional home care in the Netherlands and Belgium. Background Most of the PwD remain living at home as long as possible. Due to complex care needs, this can result in an increased risk for care provided against the wishes of the client and/or to which the client resists, referred to as involuntary treatment. Design Secondary data analyses of two cross‐sectional surveys. Methods Dementia case managers and district nurses filled in a questionnaire for each PwD in their caseload. This study included data of 627 PwD receiving professional home care in the Netherlands and 217 in Belgium. The same methodology (questionnaire and variables) was used in both samples. Descriptive statistics and multi‐level logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the data. The study adhered to the STROBE checklist. Results More than half of the PwD (50.7%) living at home received involuntary treatment (Belgium 68.2% and the Netherlands 44.7%). Nonconsensual care (82.7%) was the most common, followed by psychotropic medication (40.7%) and physical restraints (18.5%). Involuntary treatment use was associated with living alone, greater ADL dependency, lower cognitive ability, higher family caregiver burden and receiving home care in Belgium versus the Netherlands. Involuntary treatment was most often requested by family caregivers. Conclusions Involuntary treatment is often used in PwD, which is in line with previous findings indicating dementia as a risk factor for involuntary treatment use. More research is needed to gain insight into variations in prevalence across other countries, which factors influence these differences and what countries can learn from each other regarding prevention of involuntary treatment. Relevance to clinical practice To provide person‐centred care, it is important to study ways to prevent involuntary treatment in PwD and to stimulate dialogue ...