Clinical inertia in general practice, a matter of debate: a qualitative study with 114 general practitioners in Belgium.

peer reviewed ; BackgroundPrescribing that is not concordant with guidelines is increasingly referred to as clinical inertia (CI). However, CI may be only apparent, and the absence of decision may actually reflect appropriate inaction as a result of good clinical reasoning. Our study aimed to: (i) elucidate GPs inverted question mark beliefs regarding CI and the risk of CI in their own practice, (ii) identify modifiable provider-related factors associated with CI.MethodsWe conducted 8 group interviews with 114 general practitioners (GP) in Belgium, and used an integrated approach of thematic a... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Aujoulat, Isabelle
Jacquemin, Patricia
Hermans, Michel
Rietzschel, Ernst
Scheen, André
Trefois, Patrick
Darras, Elisabeth
Wens, Johan
Dokumenttyp: journal article
Erscheinungsdatum: 2015
Verlag/Hrsg.: BioMed Central
Schlagwörter: Clinical inertia / Prevention / Human health sciences / Public health / health care sciences & services / Sciences de la santé humaine / Santé publique / services médicaux & soins de santé
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26984077
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/178846