Sociétés scientifiques, musées, universités

This article discusses how the focus on colonial archaeology in Belgium moved from scientific societies to museums and universities. In comparison to the Belgian national archaeology, its colonial counterpart acquired its institutional recognition in a later stage with the creation of the anthropological section in the Congo Museum in 1898. Attention is also paid to the way in which Congolese archaeological objects were integrated within typically western discourses on the “antiquity of man”, the existence of “evolution phases” in material culture and the worldwide dispersion op the different... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Maarten Couttenier
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2012
Reihe/Periodikum: Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie, Vol 128, Pp 23-27 (2012)
Verlag/Hrsg.: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme
Schlagwörter: Belgium / Congo / diffusionism / evolutionism / institutionalisation / Archaeology / CC1-960
Sprache: Französisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26973984
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.4000/nda.1636

This article discusses how the focus on colonial archaeology in Belgium moved from scientific societies to museums and universities. In comparison to the Belgian national archaeology, its colonial counterpart acquired its institutional recognition in a later stage with the creation of the anthropological section in the Congo Museum in 1898. Attention is also paid to the way in which Congolese archaeological objects were integrated within typically western discourses on the “antiquity of man”, the existence of “evolution phases” in material culture and the worldwide dispersion op the different human “races”.