How resources determine pulmonary rehabilitation programs: A survey among Belgian chest physicians

Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to identify which barriers may exist according to respiratory physicians. A telephone and online survey was developed by a Belgian expert panel and distributed among all active Belgian chest physicians ( n = 492). Data were obtained from 200 respondents (40%). Seventy-five percentage of the chest physici... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Janssens, Wim
Corhay, Jean-Louis
Bogaerts, Peter
Derom, Eric
Frusch, Nicolas
Dang, Delphine Nguyen
Kibanda, Jesabelle
Ruttens, David
Thyrion, Lisa
Troosters, Thierry
Marchand, Eric
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Reihe/Periodikum: Chronic Respiratory Disease ; volume 16, page 147997231876773 ; ISSN 1479-9731 1479-9731
Verlag/Hrsg.: SAGE Publications
Schlagwörter: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26908105
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479972318767732

Despite overwhelming evidence of its benefits, a widespread implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is lacking and the landscape of multidisciplinary programs remains very scattered. The objective of this study is to assess how PR is organized in specialized care centres in Belgium and to identify which barriers may exist according to respiratory physicians. A telephone and online survey was developed by a Belgian expert panel and distributed among all active Belgian chest physicians ( n = 492). Data were obtained from 200 respondents (40%). Seventy-five percentage of the chest physicians had direct access to an ambulatory rehabilitation program in their hospital. Most of these programs are organized bi or triweekly for an average period of 3–6 months. Programs focus strongly on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients from secondary care, have a multidisciplinary approach and provide exercise capacity and quality of life measures as main outcomes. Yet large differences were observed in process and outcome indicators between the programs of centres with standard funding and those of specialized centres with a larger allocated budget. We conclude that multidisciplinary PR programs are available in the majority of Belgian hospitals. Differences in funding determine the quality of the team, the diversity of the interventions and the monitoring of outcomes. More resources for rehabilitation will directly improve the utilization and quality of this essential treatment option in respiratory diseases.