Comparative evaluation of two commercial real-time PCR kits (QuantiFast™ and abTES™) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and other Plasmodium species in Sabah, Malaysia

Abstract Background The monkey parasite Plasmodium knowlesi is an emerging public health issue in Southeast Asia. In Sabah, Malaysia, P. knowlesi is now the dominant cause of human malaria. Molecular detection methods for P. knowlesi are essential for accurate diagnosis and in monitoring progress towards malaria elimination of other Plasmodium species. However, recent commercially available PCR malaria kits have unpublished P. knowlesi gene targets or have not been evaluated against clinical samples. Methods Two real-time PCR methods currently used in Sabah for confirmatory malaria diagnosis a... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Nuin, Nor Afizah
Tan, Angelica F.
Lew, Yao Long
Piera, Kim A.
William, Timothy
Rajahram, Giri S.
Jelip, Jenarun
Dony, Jiloris F.
Mohammad, Rashidah
Cooper, Daniel J.
Barber, Bridget E.
Anstey, Nicholas M.
Chua, Tock H.
Grigg, Matthew J.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Malaria Journal ; volume 19, issue 1 ; ISSN 1475-2875
Verlag/Hrsg.: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Schlagwörter: Infectious Diseases / Parasitology
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26895056
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03379-2

Abstract Background The monkey parasite Plasmodium knowlesi is an emerging public health issue in Southeast Asia. In Sabah, Malaysia, P. knowlesi is now the dominant cause of human malaria. Molecular detection methods for P. knowlesi are essential for accurate diagnosis and in monitoring progress towards malaria elimination of other Plasmodium species. However, recent commercially available PCR malaria kits have unpublished P. knowlesi gene targets or have not been evaluated against clinical samples. Methods Two real-time PCR methods currently used in Sabah for confirmatory malaria diagnosis and surveillance reporting were evaluated: the QuantiFast™ Multiplex PCR kit (Qiagen, Germany) targeting the P. knowlesi 18S SSU rRNA; and the abTES™ Malaria 5 qPCR II kit (AITbiotech, Singapore), with an undisclosed P. knowlesi gene target. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using 52 P. knowlesi, 25 Plasmodium vivax , 21 Plasmodium falciparum , and 10 Plasmodium malariae clinical isolates, and 26 malaria negative controls, and compared against a validated reference nested PCR assay. The limit of detection (LOD) for each PCR method and Plasmodium species was also evaluated. Results The sensitivity of the QuantiFast™ and abTES™ assays for detecting P. knowlesi was comparable at 98.1% (95% CI 89.7–100) and 100% (95% CI 93.2–100), respectively. Specificity of the QuantiFast™ and abTES™ for P. knowlesi was high at 98.8% (95% CI 93.4–100) for both assays. The QuantiFast™ assay demonstrated falsely-positive mixed Plasmodium species at low parasitaemias in both the primary and LOD analysis. Diagnostic accuracy of both PCR kits for detecting P. vivax , P. falciparum , and P. malariae was comparable to P. knowlesi . The abTES™ assay demonstrated a lower LOD for P. knowlesi of ≤ 0.125 parasites/µL compared to QuantiFast™ with a LOD of 20 parasites/µL. Hospital microscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.8% (95% CI 65.3–88.9) and specificity of 80.4% (95% CI 67.6–89.8) compared to reference PCR for detecting P. knowlesi . Conclusion The ...