Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial)

Background: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy decreases time to functional recovery compared with open distal pancreatectomy, but the cost-effectiveness and impact on disease-specific quality of life have yet to be established. Methods: The LEOPARD trial randomized patients to minimally invasive (robot-assisted or laparoscopic) or open distal pancreatectomy in 14 Dutch centres between April 2015 and March 2017. Use of hospital healthcare resources, complications and disease-specific quality of life were recorded up to 1 year after surgery. Unit costs of hospital healthcare resources wer... Mehr ...

Verfasser: van Hilst, J.
Strating, E. A.
de Rooij, T.
Daams, F.
Festen, S.
Groot Koerkamp, B.
Klaase, J. M.
Luyer, M.
Dijkgraaf, M. G.
Besselink, M. G.
on behalf of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group and LEOPARD trial collaborators
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Schlagwörter: Adult / Aged / 80 and over / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Female / Follow-Up Studies / Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data / Humans / Laparoscopy/economics / Male / Middle Aged / Netherlands / Outcome Assessment (Health Care) / Pancreatectomy/economics / Patient Satisfaction / Postoperative Complications/economics / Quality of Life / Quality-Adjusted Life Years / Recovery of Function / Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics / Single-Blind Method / Surgery / Randomized Controlled Trial / Multicenter Study / Journal Article / Comparative Study
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26836121
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/389563