Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2) : Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Data from observational studies suggest that minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) is superior to open pancreatoduodenectomy regarding intraoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay, without increasing total costs. However, several case-matched studies failed to demonstrate superiority of MIPD, and large registry studies from the USA even suggested increased mortality for MIPDs performed in low-volume (<10 MIPDs annually) centers. Randomized controlled multicenter trials are lacking but clearly required. We hypothesize that time to func... Mehr ...

Verfasser: de Rooij, Thijs
van Hilst, Jony
Bosscha, Koop
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.
Gerhards, Michael F.
Koerkamp, Bas Groot
Hagendoorn, Jeroen
de Hingh, Ignace H.
Karsten, Tom M.
Lips, Daan J.
Luyer, Misha D.
Molenaar, I. Quintus
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Tran, T. C.Khé
Busch, Olivier R.
Festen, Sebastiaan
Besselink, Marc G.
for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Schlagwörter: Laparoscopic / Minimally invasive / Pancreatoduodenectomy / Robot-assisted / Whipple / Humans / Postoperative Complications/etiology / Treatment Outcome / Pancreatic Diseases/diagnosis / Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects / Recovery of Function / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Clinical Trials / Phase III as Topic / Netherlands / Multicenter Studies as Topic / Time Factors / Laparoscopy/adverse effects / Phase II as Topic / Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects / Pharmacology (medical) / Medicine (miscellaneous) / Journal Article
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26835693
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/371905