Lawaai als modern onheil: De draagbare radio en beheerste modernisering, 1955-1969 ; Din as modern evil: The portable radio and controlled modernization, 1955-1969

This article analyzes public opinion on the introduction and diffusion of portable radios in the Netherlands, in particular the discourse on the ubiquitous din the devices allegedly caused. This discourse, mainly comprising the digitized newspapers of the National Archive, shows that contemporaries deemed the portable and especially its use – thoroughly altering the country’s soundscape – emblematic of modernization. Examining this discourse casts new light on the way the Dutch dealt with modernization, a topic of fierce scholarly debate. The communis opinio was that portable radio users cause... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Verhoef, J.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Schlagwörter: portable radio / the Netherlands / modernization / individualization / din / Taverne
Sprache: Niederländisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26835318
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/345012

This article analyzes public opinion on the introduction and diffusion of portable radios in the Netherlands, in particular the discourse on the ubiquitous din the devices allegedly caused. This discourse, mainly comprising the digitized newspapers of the National Archive, shows that contemporaries deemed the portable and especially its use – thoroughly altering the country’s soundscape – emblematic of modernization. Examining this discourse casts new light on the way the Dutch dealt with modernization, a topic of fierce scholarly debate. The communis opinio was that portable radio users caused a nuisance that marked the beginning of a new era in which individualization eroded old values and led to hedonism. Almost all actors who addressed the topic of portable radio fiercely opposed these developments. To them the portable radio was part of a ‘modern disease’ which infected social manners and traditional values. They jointly and relentlessly – irrespective of social or religious background – condemned this aspect of modernization.