The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study.
BACKGROUND: In quality of care research, limited information is found on the relationship between quality of care and disease outcomes. This case-control study was conducted with the aim to assess the effect of guideline adherence for stroke prevention on the occurrence of stroke in general practice. We report on the problems related to a variant of confounding by indication, that may be common in quality of care studies. METHODS: Stroke patients (cases) and controls were recruited from the general practitioner's (GP) patient register, and an expert panel assessed the quality of care of cases... Mehr ...
| Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | other |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2005 |
| Schlagwörter: | Adult / Aged / 80 and over / Case-Control Studies / Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) / Family Practice/*standards / Female / Guideline Adherence/*statistics & numerical data / Health Behavior / Humans / Hypertension/complications / Male / Middle aged / Netherlands / Odds Ratio / Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / Quality Assurance / Health Care/*methods / Risk Assessment / Risk Factors / Stroke/*epidemiology/etiology/*prevention & control |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26832244 |
| Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
| Powered By: | BASE |
| Link(s) : | http://repub.eur.nl/pub/13656 |
BACKGROUND: In quality of care research, limited information is found on the relationship between quality of care and disease outcomes. This case-control study was conducted with the aim to assess the effect of guideline adherence for stroke prevention on the occurrence of stroke in general practice. We report on the problems related to a variant of confounding by indication, that may be common in quality of care studies. METHODS: Stroke patients (cases) and controls were recruited from the general practitioner's (GP) patient register, and an expert panel assessed the quality of care of cases and controls using guideline-based review criteria. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients was assessed. Compared to patients without shortcomings in preventive care, patients who received sub-optimal care appeared to have a lower risk of experiencing a stroke (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.53). This result was partly explained by the presence